ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

To SUBMIT an e-letter please go to the abstract/full text of the article and click the 'Submit a response' link in the box to the right of the text. For further help click here.

* To: ADC Fetal and Neonatal Edition Letters and ADC Education and Practice Letters

Electronic Letters to:

Original articles:
J Dunning, J Patrick Daly, J-P Lomas, F Lecky, J Batchelor, K Mackway-Jones on behalf of the children’s head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events (CHALICE) study group
Derivation of the children’s head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events decision rule for head injury in children
Arch Dis Child 2006; 91: 885-891 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read eLetter] Practical issues
Marion Schmidt   (27 October 2006)

Practical issues 27 October 2006
  Top
Marion Schmidt,
Consultant Paediatrician

Send letter to journal:
Re: Practical issues

marion.schmidt{at}gwent.wales.nhs.uk Marion Schmidt

Dear Editor,

Thanks you for a very thourough study addressing the important issue of head injury in children.

However in practical terms doing a CT scan on 14 % of all children presenting to A+E with head injury can be difficult.

Many children particularly toddlers will not allow a scan without sedation or a general anaesthetic which again increase the risk associated with CT. In a DGH setting there are often anaesthetists on call with little experience with children and an understandable reluctance to anaesthetise a child who is well but has e.g. vomited more than 3 times.

How do you address this within your hospitals ?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health