ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Archives of Disease in Childhood 2005;90:773-774; doi:10.1136/adc.2004.066779
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malone, P S J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malone, P S J
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Articles

PERSPECTIVE

Circumcision

Circumcision for preventing urinary tract infection in boys: European view

P S J Malone

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Padraig S J Malone
Department of Paediatric Nephro-Urology, G Level, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Tremona Rd, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; pat.malone@suht.swest.nhs.uk


Commentary on the paper by Singh-Grewel et al (see page 853)

Keywords: circumcision; urinary tract infection

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Circumcision is the commonest surgical procedure carried out in boys and it probably originated 15 000 years ago.1 It was initially done for religious, ritualistic, and cultural reasons and it was not until the 19th century that the procedure was "medicalised". The original therapeutic circumcisions were performed for phimosis and since then indications for surgery have altered with the trends of the day. In some countries these trends turned to dogma, resulting in the virtual routine circumcision of newborn boys. It was estimated that 61% of all boys born in the USA in 1987 were circumcised.2 It is also fascinating to observe how this dogma can pervade other cultures. Traditionally Koreans did not circumcise their boys until their exposure to many thousands of American troops during the Korean War; now Korea is the only country in that region practising routine circumcision.3 This high rate of routine newborn circumcision generated . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Articles

Atoms
Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2005 90: 771. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies
D Singh-Grewal, J Macdessi, and J Craig
Arch. Dis. Child. 2005 90: 853-858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. D. Dickerman
Circumcision in the Time of HIV: When Is There Enough Evidence to Revise the American Academy of Pediatrics' Policy on Circumcision?
Pediatrics, May 1, 2007; 119(5): 1006 - 1007.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
G Hill and J V Geisheker
Edgar Schoen does not represent the North American view of male circumcision
Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2006; 91(1): 92 - 92.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
I A Hughes
A perspective on perspectives
Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 771 - 771.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health