ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WHEELER, R.
Right arrow Articles by FOOTE, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WHEELER, R.
Right arrow Articles by FOOTE, K.
Arch Dis Child 2000;82:187-188 ( March )

Leading article

Pectus excavatum: studiously ignored in the United Kingdom?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

    Article

Pectus excavatum describes a malformation of the anterior chest wall characterised by a hollowing over the sternum and an associated prominence of the costochondral junction. The resulting depression in the chest wall, the opposite situation to pigeon chest (pectus carinatum), is variable in severity, ranging from a mere indentation to an extreme form where the sternum lies within a few centimetres of the vertebral column. The reported incidence is eight per 1000 population, more commonly in boys. It might be anticipated that such a deformity would have significant implications for cardiorespiratory function and pose a cosmetic challenge.

Patients with pectus excavatum have a mild restrictive ventilatory defect,1 but functional impairment is difficult to demonstrate, appearing at only the extreme limit of exercise tolerance.2 Despite an increase in the intrathoracic volume postoperatively, there is no substantial associated improvement in pulmonary function.3

The North American and [continental] European literature abound with references to . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. E. Kelly Jr, T. F. Cash, R. C. Shamberger, K. K. Mitchell, R. B. Mellins, M. L. Lawson, K. Oldham, R. G. Azizkhan, A. V. Hebra, D. Nuss, et al.
Surgical Repair of Pectus Excavatum Markedly Improves Body Image and Perceived Ability for Physical Activity: Multicenter Study
Pediatrics, December 1, 2008; 122(6): 1218 - 1222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Raichura, J Entwisle, J Leverment, and C S Beardsmore
Breath-hold MRI in evaluating patients with pectus excavatum
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2001; 74(884): 701 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S CUNNINGHAM and M HARRIS
Are sleep studies worth doing?
Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2001; 84(1): 89h - 89.
[Full Text]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Upper age limit
Tim J Cribb, et al.
ADC Online, 19 Feb 2004 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health