| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine.
A cross sectional study was carried out to determine whether schoolchildren in a specific locality exposed to pollution from steam coal dust have an excess of respiratory symptoms compared with children in control areas. A total of 1872 primary schoolchildren (aged 5-11 years) from five primary schools in the Bootle dock area of Liverpool (exposed area), five primary schools in South Sefton (control area), and five primary schools in Wallasey (control area) were studied. A questionnaire was distributed through the schools and was completed by the parents of the children. The questionnaire inquired about respiratory symptoms (cough, wheezing, and shortness of breath), allergy, atopy, smoking, and socioeconomic factors. Height, weight, and peak expiratory flow were measured. Compliance was good (92%) and similar in the three study areas. The children in the three areas were of similar mean age (7.5 years), height (1.24 m), sex ratio, and had a similar prevalence of paternal (6.2%) and maternal (7%) asthma. The exposed zone contained more unemployed parents (41, 29, and 29% respectively), more rented housing (64, 45, 34%), and more smoking parents (71, 60, 59%) than the control areas. Respiratory symptoms were significantly more common in the exposed area, including wheeze (25.0, 20.6, and 17.5%), excess cough (40.0, 23.4, and 25.1%), and school absences for respiratory symptoms (47.5, 35.9, and 34.9%). These differences remained significant even if the groups were subdivided according to whether or not parents smoked or were employed. Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed the exposed zone as a significant risk factor for absenteeism from school due to respiratory symptoms (odds ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 2.06) after adjusting for confounding factors. Standard dust deposit gauges on three schools confirmed a significantly higher dust burden in the exposed zone. An increased prevalence of respiratory symptoms in primary schoolchildren exposed to coal dust is confirmed. Although the association with known coal dust pollution is suggestive a cross sectional study cannot confirm a casual relation and further studies are needed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Hendryx and M. M. Ahern Relations Between Health Indicators and Residential Proximity to Coal Mining in West Virginia Am J Public Health, April 1, 2008; 98(4): 669 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Reynolds, T. P. Jones, K. A. BeruBe, H. Wise, and R. Richards Toxicity of airborne dust generated by opencast coal mining Mineralogical Magazine, April 1, 2003; 67(2): 141 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Pless-Mulloli, D. Howel, and H. Prince Prevalence of asthma and other respiratory symptoms in children living near and away from opencast coal mining sites Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2001; 30(3): 556 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R S Cane, S C Ranganathan, and S A McKenzie What do parents of wheezy children understand by "wheeze"? Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2000; 82(4): 327 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Pless-Mulloli, D. Howel, A. King, I. Stone, J. Merefield, J. Bessell, and R. Darnell Living near opencast coal mining sites and children's respiratory health Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2000; 57(3): 145 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
| ARCH DIS CHILD | FETAL NEONATAL ED | ED PRACTICE |
