ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Werneke, U.
Right arrow Articles by MacFaul, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Werneke, U.
Right arrow Articles by MacFaul, R.
Arch Dis Child 1997;77:294-298 ( October )

Validation of the paediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol in British practice

Ursula Werneke,a Helen Smith,b Iain J Smith,c Jeanette Taylor,d Roderick MacFauld

a London Health Economics Consortium, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, b Wessex Primary Care Research Network, Southampton, c Nuffield Institute for Health, Leeds, d Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, London

Correspondence to: Dr R MacFaul, Health Services Committee, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 5 St Andrews Place, Regents Park, London NW1 4 LB.


Accepted 21 May 1997

The reliability and validity of the North American paediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol (PAEP) for use in paediatric practice in Britain was tested. The protocol was applied to 418 case records of consecutive emergency admissions to three Yorkshire district general hospitals. The PAEP ratings were then compared with a clinical consensus opinion obtained from two expert panels. Altogether 32% of the admissions were rated inappropriate by the PAEP and 36% by the panels. Validity of the PAEP, as measured by agreement beyond chance with the expert panel rating, was only moderate with a kappa  of 0.29 (95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.47). The PAEP has limited validity for evaluating British paediatric practice. Utilisation review instruments developed in differing clinical cultures should be used with caution until shown to be valid for the practice setting under review.

Keywords: paediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol; hospitalisation; paediatric admissions


© 1997 by Archives of Disease in Childhood



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. Mahant, R. Peterson, M. Campbell, D. L. MacGregor, and J. N. Friedman
Reducing Inappropriate Hospital Use on a General Pediatric Inpatient Unit
Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): e1068 - e1073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
G. De Marco, S. Mangani, A. Correra, S. Di Caro, L. Tarallo, A. De Franciscis, T. Jefferson, and A. Guarino
Reduction of Inappropriate Hospital Admissions of Children With Influenza-Like Illness Through the Implementation of Specific Guidelines: A Case-Controlled Study
Pediatrics, October 1, 2005; 116(4): e506 - e511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
D Ogilvie
Hospital based alternatives to acute paediatric admission: a systematic review
Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 138 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
M BLAIR
Public health: Taking a population perspective on child health
Arch. Dis. Child., July 1, 2000; 83(1): 7 - 9.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
M K Lal and M S Kibirige
Unscheduled return visits within 72 hours to an assessment unit
Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 1999; 80(5): 455 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
R MacFaul, M Stewart, U Werneke, J Taylor-Meek, H E Smith, and I J Smith
Parental and professional perception of need for emergency admission to hospital: prospective questionnaire based study
Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 1998; 79(3): 213 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1997 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health