|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
a London Health Economics
Consortium, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, b Wessex Primary Care Research Network, Southampton, c Nuffield Institute for Health, Leeds, d Royal College of Paediatrics and Child
Health, London
Correspondence to: Dr R MacFaul, Health Services Committee, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 5 St Andrews Place, Regents Park, London NW1 4 LB.
Accepted 21
May 1997
The reliability and validity of the North American paediatric
appropriateness evaluation protocol (PAEP) for use in paediatric practice in Britain was tested. The protocol was applied to 418 case
records of consecutive emergency admissions to three Yorkshire district
general hospitals. The PAEP ratings were then compared with a clinical
consensus opinion obtained from two expert panels. Altogether 32% of
the admissions were rated inappropriate by the PAEP and 36% by the
panels. Validity of the PAEP, as measured by agreement beyond chance
with the expert panel rating, was only moderate with a
of 0.29 (95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.47). The PAEP has limited validity
for evaluating British paediatric practice. Utilisation review
instruments developed in differing clinical cultures should be used
with caution until shown to be valid for the practice setting under review.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Mahant, R. Peterson, M. Campbell, D. L. MacGregor, and J. N. Friedman Reducing Inappropriate Hospital Use on a General Pediatric Inpatient Unit Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): e1068 - e1073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Marco, S. Mangani, A. Correra, S. Di Caro, L. Tarallo, A. De Franciscis, T. Jefferson, and A. Guarino Reduction of Inappropriate Hospital Admissions of Children With Influenza-Like Illness Through the Implementation of Specific Guidelines: A Case-Controlled Study Pediatrics, October 1, 2005; 116(4): e506 - e511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Ogilvie Hospital based alternatives to acute paediatric admission: a systematic review Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 138 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M BLAIR Public health: Taking a population perspective on child health Arch. Dis. Child., July 1, 2000; 83(1): 7 - 9. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M K Lal and M S Kibirige Unscheduled return visits within 72 hours to an assessment unit Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 1999; 80(5): 455 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R MacFaul, M Stewart, U Werneke, J Taylor-Meek, H E Smith, and I J Smith Parental and professional perception of need for emergency admission to hospital: prospective questionnaire based study Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 1998; 79(3): 213 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
| ARCH DIS CHILD | FETAL NEONATAL ED | ED PRACTICE |