ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castro-Rodríguez, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by León-Barúa, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castro-Rodríguez, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by León-Barúa, R.
Arch Dis Child 1997;77:201-205 ( September )

Differentiation of osmotic and secretory diarrhoea by stool carbohydrate and osmolar gap measurements

José Antonio Castro-Rodríguez, Eduardo Salazar-Lindo, Raúl León-Barúa

Departments of Paediatrics and Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia and Instituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Perú

Correspondence to: and reprint requests to: Dr José Antonio Castro-Rodríguez, Instituto Médico Infantil, Barros Errazurriz 1919, Providencia, Santiago, Chile.


Accepted 3 May 1997

Clinical features and laboratory tests that determine carbohydrate in faeces were evaluated to determine which was best able to distinguish between osmotic and secretory diarrhoea in infants and children. For this purpose 80 boys aged 3 to 24 months, with acute watery diarrhoea, were studied prospectively. The faecal osmolar gap (FOG) was calculated as: serum osmolarity - [2 × (faecal sodium + potassium concentration)]. Fifty eight patients were classified as having predominantly osmotic diarrhoea (FOG >100 mosmol/l), and 22 as having predominantly secretory diarrhoea (FOG =<100 mosmol/l). The two groups were comparable in their clinical features on admission, in the results of blood and urine tests, and in the evolution of their diarrhoeal illness. Evidence of steatorrhoea (by positive Sudan III test) and of acid faecal pH on admission were significantly more frequent in patients with osmotic diarrhoea. Mean (SD) faecal osmolarity was not significantly different between the two groups (319 (80) mosmol/l in secretory diarrhoea v 361 (123) mosmol/l in osmotic diarrhoea). Tests for reducing substances in faeces such as Benedict's test---with and without hydrolysis---and glucose strip, all showed a positive and significant association with osmotic diarrhoea (p <0.05, <0.025, <0.05, respectively). The presence of excess reducing substances (Benedict's test with hydrolysis >++) on admission was the most sensitive and specific test with the best predictive value for differentiating between the two types of watery diarrhoea.

Keywords: diarrhoea; faecal osmolar gap; carbohydrate malabsorption


© 1997 by Archives of Disease in Childhood






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1997 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health